| |
|
Article: <5ar3gu$t6f@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: SPIN - the Zetas Explain
Date: 6 Jan 1997 14:51:10 GMT
In article <5ajhd7$4u7@pollux.cmc.doe.ca> Greg Neill
writes:
> Nancy (saquo@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>> (Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
>> This is terminology, which we explained. Theoretical
speed
>> is fastest at the center. You're arguing just to argue.
>>
>> The smaller the area involved, the faster the spin, this
was
>> our point. To avoid GIVING us this simple point, you
find
>> some reason to argue, over nothing.
>> (End ZetaTalk[TM])
>
> Apparently Nancy believes that something
"theoretical" is
> something which cannot be measured. .. What is this
> "theoretical" speed you are talking about? What
property of
> matter would make something's "theoretical" speed
depend
> upon its position with respect to some other point?
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
What's the mystery? I'm putting a label to something you OBSERVE!
You discuss theoretical situations all the time, situations that
are NOT observed but only speculated upon. Yet when we state that
a given spinning object, whether a top or an air mass or a
skater, spins faster when the area that is spinning is reduced,
brought in toward the center of the spinning mass, this is
considered incomprehensible. Is this because Nancy is a woman or
because we are not human? We're not allowed to discuss matter, is
that it? Only human males can do so, else the subject matter is
incomprehensible?
(End ZetaTalk[TM])