| |
|
Article: <5ar3ba$ci9@sjx-ixn8.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain
Date: 6 Jan 1997 14:48:10 GMT
In article <5am4of$fpu$1@news.sas.ab.ca> Paul Campbell
writes:
>> Nancy's argument is basically as follows.
>>
>> 1. The solar system is stable. Hence any perturbations
that
>> occur would destabilize the solar system given enough
time.
>> Since this is obviously not the case the perturbations
must
>> have some mechanism so that the orbits would return to
>> normal. Since this is in direct violation of Newtonian
physics
>> it means that Newtonian physics is fundamentaly flawed.
>>
>> 2. The mechanism that allows for the planets to regain
their
>> proper orbits after a perturbation is a repulsive form
of gravity.
>> This repulsion is not equal and opposite to the
attractive form
>> of gravity but does manifest itself greatly as planetary
objects
>> approach one another, presumably it's something like an
>> inverse cube law or whatever, we will never know as
Nancy
>> can't do mathematics.
>
> My musings on the subject...
>
> If all perturbations have their orbits return to normal so
that the
> solar system is stable then the net effect of gravity on the
system
> is zero.
> scopedr@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca ()
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
You were doing fine until you started to think for yourself.
Return to contemplating our explainations. Just let it sink in.
You're still upset that reality is challenging your gods and this
is clouding your thinking process.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])