| |
|
Article: <5bc489$nh2@sjx-ixn8.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: GRAVITY - the Zetas Explain
Date: 13 Jan 1997 01:47:53 GMT
In article <5b92uu$rv6@pollux.cmc.doe.ca> Greg Neill
writes:
>>> Newton's theory of Gravitation fits those fact
nicely.
>>> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
>>
>> (Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
>> What you are seeing is a BALANCE between forces, forces
>> which you do not understand but have only tinkered with
and
>> measured. And you've tinkered only with those forces you
>> are aware of. What Newton did was DESCRIBE this balance,
>> not explain it.
>> (End ZetaTalk[TM])
>
> And if the discription is perfectly adequate without
cluttering
> it up with extraneous mystery forces and sweeping vorticies
of
> force, why do so? If these forces and influences cannot be
seen
> or measured, why introduce them into a theory?
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
Sounds like a call to return to the Dark Ages to me! And STOP ALL THAT TALK about subatomic particles. Those explainations from the Middle Ages on the composition of matter are quite good enough!