| |
|
Article: <5c0q17$mnp@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: HALE-BOPP vs 12TH PLANET - the Zetas Explain
Date: 20 Jan 1997 22:02:15 GMT
In article <32DEF8B2.31ED@navix.net> David Knisley
writes:
> Here is what COMET HALE-BOPP looked like this morning.
> For more information on it, check out the Hale-Bopp Web
page:
> http://www.halebopp.com
> "David W. Knisely" <dk84538@navix.net>
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
We would recommend that people NOT take David Knisley's word for
ANYTHING. This man lies, and wishes to have the sheep of
sci.astro take his word for the appearance of this fraud. Why
does the readership need HIS descriptions of what Hale-Bopp looks
like, at this point in time? Is it not supposed to be a glorious
panorama across the sky at this point? Is it not to take the
breath of the beholder away at this point? The comet of the
millennium? A comet of such massive proportions that it was
outbursting out past Jupiter?
Now no one can find it, but we should take David Knisley's
word for it? We hope that even the sheep of sci.astro are a bit
uncomfortable with this scenario, and will post what THEY see at
the orbit location posted for this fraud. Tails pointing in the
WRONG direction? No tail at all? Precisely. You're looking at
whatever happens to be in the sky at that RA and Dec, nothing
more. If you allow yourself to be led past perihelion with this
nonsense of having your shepherd TELL you what he hopes you'll
believe is up there, then you're all beyond hope.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])