| |
|
Article: <5fpf2d$1d4@sjx-ixn7.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: 12th Planet - any photos ?
Date: 7 Mar 1997 16:17:17 GMT
In article <331E5981.3D3C@sc.hp.com> Chris Franks
writes:
> Nancy, we are all assuming that the only way the 12th planet
> can change its velocity is by the Keplerian velocity rule of
> sweeping vectors. ... it must follow an elliptical path of
> free fall.
> Chris Franks <cfranks@sc.hp.com>
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
In this you are assuming that your Keplerian rules and elliptical
orbit theories are CORRECT for all objects! There is a debate
ongoing called Long Ellipse Orbits, where the behavior of your
own probes stands in contradiction to your theories on how and
why comets turn around out in space for their return. These
theories also stand in contraction to your laws of gravity and
motion! Can't even put them all out for discussion on the same
message board without having these glaring discrepancies reveals.
Your astro physicists simply don't TRY to reconcile these
contradictions, they just look the other way!
This is SCIENCE? Don't look at the facts if they make you
uncomfortable? Nevertheless, you teach your young these
contradictions, and if they dare to question their teachers are
punished! Gods are not allowed to be questioned. Students are to
pay their tuition and be led about like Sheep. One of the many
reasons there are so many sheep on sic.astro. If they became
astronomers, they learned to think in a micro-focus manner, not
putting the whole picture together at once. This gave their
teachers a headache and gave the students bad grades. Only those
who refused to think about the big picture get elevated in
astronomy, as is so often the case in human society. Blind
obediency is rewarded.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])