Re: Planet X: (Science News) A Comet's Odd Orbit Hints at Hidden Planet

In Article <3AF01BEF.5A7AEA33@cnde.iastate.edu> Sam Wormley wrote:
> Readers are encouraged to read the paper at:
> http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0103435
> ABSTRACT
>    By telescopic tracking, we have established that the orbit of the
>    trans-neptunian object (2000 CR105) has a perihelion of about 44 au,
>    and is thus outside the domain controlled by strong gravitational
>    close encounters with Neptune. Because this object is on a very large,
>    eccentric orbit (with semimajor axis a about 216 au and eccentricity e
>    of 0.8) this object must have been placed on this orbit by a gravitational
>    perturbation which is NOT direct gravitational scattering off
>    of any of the giant planets (on their current orbits).

The Zetas wish to comment:

    The gravitational perturbation, indeed, is outside your
    solar system but affecting ALL your planets steadily,
    and by more than a gravitational pull.  There is confusion,
    in understanding the nature of the Planet X eccentric
    orbit and the effect it and your Sun's dark binary twin,
    because man is struggling to reconcile this new
    information with existing astrophysics theories and the
    math formulas used to describe them.  Somehow they all
    MUST fit, and they don't.  The problem lies with the
    theories and formulas, though few throw them aside as
    then they feel adrift, without an anchor.  The insecure
    slam shut the doors, close out new information, and
    develop the closed-mind syndrome recently under
    discussion here on sci.astro.

    For those not closed minded, we will describe the
    eccentric orbit of Planet X, between your Sun and its
    dark twin.  This unlit binary sun lies some 18.74 times
    the distance from your Sun to Pluto, at a 11 degree
    angle from the ecliptic, in the direction of the
    constellation of Orion.  Though farther away, twice the
    distance or more, from where Planet X rides at the
    moment, it is a large gravitational giant, and thus
    between these two binaries Planet X is caught in a
    highly elliptical orbit.  This orbit does NOT fit into
    man's astrophysics theories, and thus it cannot be
    described by the math used by man to describe comet
    or orbit behavior.  Yet the orbit makes sense, if one
    puts the dictates of man's current theories aside.

    There is a desk-top toy composed of several metal
    balls hung in a line from a wooden frame, which
    when set in motion causes the end balls to swing out,
    then return to bump all the balls in the row until the
    ball on the OPPOSITE end swings out in an equal
    manner, thence continuing until gravity wears the
    motion down to a stop.  This toy is a simple example
    that an object WILL stop, when "escaping" a gravity
    pull, and return toward that gravity pull by reversing
    its course.   That most known planets or moons go
    AROUND their gravitational giants is due to a
    phenomena of gravity we have termed the Repulsion
    Force, though it is simply gravity particles spurting
    out from large bodies such that they are kept apart
    like two fire hoses turned on one another.

    Planet X, like the balls in the desk-top toy described,
    slings back and forth between its two gravitational
    foci, returning on almost exactly the same path.  Its
    momentum causes it to overshoot a focus, then like
    the balls in the toy, to return on the same path after
    coming to a full stop.  Why would it NOT do that,
    when both foci are directly behind it?  This is
    equivalent to the end ball in the toy, dropping back
    toward Earth due to gravity.  When approaching one
    of its suns, Planet X picks up speed, as the end ball
    does when dropping, and thus acts like a comet when
    coming through the solar system.  It shoots
    THROUGH the solar system, its speed causing it to
    bypass the sun.  Once past, with both gravitational
    pulls behind it, it stops, as the end ball in the toy
    does, and then returns on the same path, as the end
    ball does.

    This is not a curved orbit, it is a sling orbit,
    and for those who would argue that such an orbit
    cannot exist, we would point to the desk-top toy,
    where the end ball returns SO PRECISELY that it
    connects with the other balls in the toy line-up so
    that the motion repeats itself with only gravity
    bringing it to an eventual halt.  The back and forth
    sling is a return trip, as the toy demonstrates.  The
    difference between Planet X and the desk-top toy
    is that the toy had its major gravity pull in the center,
    bringing the motion to a stop, where Planet X has
    dual gravitaional pulls at the ends of its sling orbit,
    which keeps the slinging motion going.
         ZetaTalk™