Re: Planet X Animated GIF

In Article <Pine.BSI.4.02.10204281943350.1323-100000@frogger.telerama.com> Duncan wrote:
> I've put together an animated GIF file of NEAT 
> SKyMorph images of the relevant area of sky, 

The doctored ones, or undoctored?  Dave Tholen and the other Neat NEAT
Trick folks have had some time to do their magic.  Recall, on the 
    Planet X: Neat NEAT Trick
    Planet X: Changing the Past? 
threads last February, Steve Havas wrote:

    When I was trying to bring up the NEAT images 
    from Dec. 16/2001 that IMO had on his site 
    ... all three pictures come up with only a small
    part viewable in the shape of a cross and says 
    there are serious astrometry errors with the 
    image. When I go to see the actual .fits file 
    most of the data appears to be missing. 
    Definitely someone has been in there I think 
    for it to look like that and it has to have been 
    recent otherwise IMO would not have been 
    able to post those image on his website...
        Steve Havas

NEAT image at

In Article <3C7D2AA5.35E63605@zetatalk.com> Nancy Lieder wrote:
> In Article <3C717603.C2015A6C@zetatalk.com> Nancy Lieder wrote:
>> Steve Havas (shavas7@hotmail.com) wrote:
>>>> A second set of infrared images of Planet X was taken 
>>>> on Jan 19, 2002. The Haute-Provence Observatory ..
>>
>>> I see Dave Tholen has not made any comments yet... 
>>> Does this image speak for itself?
>>
>> Dave is waiting for instructions from his handlers.
>
> And he apparently GOT them! I received a note from 
> Steve Havas regarding a new NEAT image recently 
> taken and trumped by Tholen debunking the Jan 19th 
> imaging of Planet X, claiming that it also shows up a 
> year earlier.
>
>    Nancy, when I was finally able to bring up the .fits
>    file of the NEAT image (2001-01-17) I was able to 
>    confirm that they do show an existing object exactly 
>    where the object is in the Jan 19/2002 image. The 
>    other object that was shown on the Jan 19, 2002 
>    image (below and left when inverted and rotated) 
>    is not present. 
>          Steve Havas