Re: Planet X: MOVED to Oct 4 Coordinates

Earl Colby Pottinger wrote in message <uqancc8lbq3n76@corp.supernews.com>
> imopenmind@netscape.net (I M Openmind) :
>
>> Steve and Dell and others continue to play with single frame pixel
>> defects as I show 
>> and Nancy proves again that she is always wrong by confirming that a 4
>> pixel defect on Steve's frame 4 is her "planet"
>
> Now Nancy faces a big problem.  Finding 1 pixel noise, easy!  Finding 2-3
> pixel noise, takes a little looking.  Finding 4 pixel noise or defect,
> harder still.  But the more pixels needed, harder to find random matches.  6
> pixels is going to be very hard and eight pixels (unless it is a very cheap
> CCD) near impossible!
>
>              Earl Colby Pottinger

Nancy doesn't face any problem, you guys are the ones facing the problem! What are 
the odds of this 4 pixel "noise" along with a companion white light 2 pixel "noise" 
showing up in two images in a row, at the exact location of the Zeta coordinates and 
additionally moving exactly as the Zeta coordinates predict from Sept 21 to Oct 4 and 
being the correct predicted size in addition? Hmmm... what are the odds??? The odds are 
only going to get better for PX and exponentially worse for you!

> I make public email sent to me!  Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, RAMDISK, Cabin
> Raising, Camping, BoatBuilding.  What happened to the time?
> http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp